Wednesday, August 30, 2006

25 days, 100 hits, vacation!

I've been posting daily (with one skip) for 25 days, and I would like to thank an Echidne reader from North Liberty, Iowa, who uses dohrn.com as a service provider for giving me my 100th hit earlier today.*

I will celebrate this milestone by going camping! (OK, it's just coincidence.)

What I'm reading today:

And the folks who have linked here: Shake's Sis, The Left End of the Dial, Persephone's Box (how did she know I was a secret Canadaphile?), Blanked Out, and Norwegianity. And the Booman Tribune, where I throw my choicest catches.

Look for more humanistic nihilism on Saturday or Sunday. TTFN!

*It's hard to tell which of the hits are from my server, and which are not, so I threw them all out when counting to 100.

Naomi Klein on Katrina

Someone once said that the global justice movement doesn't have leaders, but we do have rockstars. Naomi Klein is one of them. Like all rockstars, there's glamor and reality and a difference between them, but incisive critiques of capitalism are hard to come by in the corporate media. Maybe that's why she's at the Guardian, which is a non-profit.

Disaster Capitalism: how to make money out of misery is one of those critiques.

The first step was the government's abdication of its core responsibility to protect the population from disasters. Under the Bush administration, whole sectors of the government, most notably the Department of Homeland Security, have been turned into glorified temp agencies, with essential functions contracted out to private companies. The theory is that entrepreneurs, driven by the profit motive, are always more efficient (please suspend hysterical laughter).

We saw the results in New Orleans one year ago: Washington was frighteningly weak and inept, in part because its emergency management experts had fled to the private sector and its technology and infrastructure had become positively retro. At least by comparison, the private sector looked modern and competent.

This is what happens when you get people who hate governing into government. This is what happens when the political and media system are under the control of a group of highway bandits who are waging vicious class war on behalf of the rich. Welcome to the neo-neo world; neo-liberal economics with neo-conservative foreign policy.

I call it the Disaster Capitalism Complex. Whatever you might need in a serious crunch, these contractors can provide it: generators, watertanks, cots, port-a-potties, mobile homes, communications systems, helicopters, medicine, men with guns.

This state-within-a-state has been built almost exclusively with money from public contracts, including the training of its staff (overwhelmingly former civil servants, politicians and soldiers). Yet it is all privately owned; taxpayers have absolutely no control over it or claim to it

This is all funded by the huge debt gift that the neo-neos have been preparing for us when we graduate from this hellish period. The gift that keeps on giving. With the public services gutted, the infrastructure will be privately owned.

Here's a snapshot of what could be in store in the not-too-distant future: helicopter rides off rooftops in flooded cities at $5,000 a pop ($7,000 for families, pets included), bottled water and "meals ready to eat" at $50 a head (steep, but that's supply and demand)

Can't happen? We would never let such important things as disaster relief slip into the hands of the greedy capitalists? Think again.

The model, of course, is the US healthcare system, in which the wealthy can access best-in-class treatment in spa-like environments while 46 million Americans lack health insurance.

They used to defend our inequitable distribution of wealth by claiming that a rising tide lifts all boats. Well, Naomi suggests that we think again...

One year ago, New Orleans's working-class and poor citizens were stranded on their rooftops waiting for help that never came, while those who could pay their way escaped to safety. The country's political leaders claim it was all some terrible mistake, a breakdown in communication that is being fixed. Their solution is to go even further down the catastrophic road of "private-sector solutions."

Unless a radical change of course is demanded, New Orleans will prove to be a glimpse of a dystopian future, a future of disaster apartheid in which the wealthy are saved and everyone else is left behind.

BONUS LINK: Big Daddy of Fundie Mormonism Arrested
Under Mr Jeffs' reign, a culture of abuse thrived at the FLDS. The fundamentalist sect broke away from the mainstream Mormon church in 1890 when it renounced polygamy. Warren Jeffs formally inherited command from his father, Rulon, in 2002 but he had run it for several years before. In that time, hundreds of teenage girls were allegedly shared out among Mr Jeffs and his male lieutenants. The 50-year-old leader is reported to have fathered more than 50 children by 40 wives.

Tuesday, August 29, 2006

Katrina

I missed the blogswarm (heard about it from Shake's Sis) but here's a thought, written about 6 months after, by my great friend Windsmith (with some assist from myself...)

O Little Town of New Orleans
Tune: O Little Town of Bethlehem


O little town of New Orleans, where does the water lie?
Above thy deeply flooded streets, see Air Force One fly by.
Yet in thy dark streets shineth a Halliburton light.
As all environmental rules are waived for them tonight.

The chaos born of Katrina showed FEMA at its worst
While help poured forth from normal folks,
their lies were well-rehearsed.
“We didn’t see it coming; we had no way to know.
When bad things happen to poor folks –
we never watch that show.”

O little town of New Orleans, how quickly you’ll regrow!
Your people won’t be home for years, but Mardi Gras’s a go!
We’re saving boozy strip clubs; but not the city’s core
Two weeks was long enough to care; now let’s forget the poor.


Let's hope the belated re-remembering of the first anniversary goes more than two days.

Monday, August 28, 2006

The Pope as Caesar, or, Why I Am Not A Catholic.

I find the Catholic Church fascinating. I find that the current pope was a Nazi as a teen – specifically, a member of an Austrian Hitler Youth group – fascinating. But what fascinates me most is the connection to Rome.

The Church is the direct living descendant of the Roman Empire. I mean, it's the Roman Catholic Church. When the structures of the Roman state were falling, the ruling classes sought refuge in the Catholic Church. The language of the Senate and People of Rome was the language of the educated classes of Europe for two thousand years. Two thousand years.

You'd have thought the Church had learned a lot in those years. It's an amazing thing, an institution hanging on from about 400 AD to now.

Gotta say, though, there's some pretty crappy stuff done in those 1600 years.

Our family was nominally Catholic. We stopped going to church when I was 7 or 8. Baptized but not confirmed. A father who was a rationalist and a mother who'd been in a school full of mean Quebecois nuns.

That was fine by me; I was a science fiction fan and a humanist. When I was in World History, we did an exercise where we debated the Reformation. Catholics, Protestants, and Humanists. We Humanists rocked. (The teacher stole it from us, man – three way tie my ass. (Covering his ass, more likely.))

I took a class from a Okie who'd converted to Hinduism (he was a C.O. in WW2, and was an Eastern Philosophies prof. Cool guy.) His wife was a Zen Buddhist, and she would always tell seekers to look at the faith of their birth, first.

Well, there's one big problem I have with the Church. They're all weird about sex. And the violence. Two – two big problems with the church. And the hierarchy. Three! Three big problems with the Catholic Church! (And neat red suits.)
  1. Weird about sex. As in, teaching kids and adults things that are horribly crippling to healthy sexuality. No birth control? But what do you expect from a system that systematically disenfranchises women? The College of Cardinals has to be one of the oldest boy's clubs – no women allowed – in the world. Frankly, the stuff about sexual abuse in the church is historically nothing, given point 2…
  2. The violence. The Inquisition was horrific. Muslims, Jews, witches, old women, political enemies; tortured and killed and imprisoned and ruined and stolen from. Add in the Crusades and the subjugation of South and Central America? There's waaaay too much blood spilt in the name of the Prince of Peace for me. But if the Pope says it's OK…
  3. The hierarchy. How many other faiths claim the status of God-King anymore? The Pope is on top of the Cardinals, who are on top of the Bishops, who are on top of the priests, who are on top of the men, who are on top of the women. This is one of the worst monkey behaviors, this piling of hierarchy, and it creates problems at the top. And this is a structure that's been going strong (they call it the Apostolic Succession) for many many years.
Unlike my last post, bitching about the Democrats, I'm will mention that there are some amazing things in (and around) the Catholic Church. Liberation Theology and the Catholic Worker movement seriously rock. One of the people in my wedding ceremony was a nun, and the Sisters of St. Joseph here in the Twin Cities are bedrock.

But what I'm really into is talking about this new pope. When it looked like JP2 was going to go – a pope I had some respect for – I was like "Anyone but Ratzinger."

Some of my Catholic friends, and some Catholics I've read have tried to say he's not all bad. But check this out.

  • The reason that Ratzinger got elected is because the media was speculating he might be. The right-wing corporate propaganda media buzz got to all these old guys from backward countries who were used to being layered by legions of flappers (in the Panglossian sense) who were bowled over by a smarmy suit on a cable channel with really good production values. So this guy was put in by the same people who gave credibility to the Bush regime.
  • Before he was pope, Ratzi was in charge of the Inquisition. (Oh, the defenders of the faith or something…) And he used that position to keep the homophobic agenda of the Church in place.
  • And, before he was Pope Mr. Church-State was the cardinal who said that John Kerry could be refused communion because he was pro-choice. Nice manipulation of the American election. Taking orders from the Vatican?
  • When he was going up the ladder in the Church hierarchy in the 60s, as Paris was rising up, the youth mobilizing, the world changing, Ratzinger was doing what, exactly? Decrying the culture of the youth and the time. Yes, he was one of those men in the halls of power as the people rose up outside, tut-tutting over their beastly excesses, plotting to regain and retain power.
  • Now that he IS Pope, Ratzi's gone apeshit over the power and regalia of the office. He threw out the Papal Haberdashers – who'd been making dresses for Popes for over 400 years – because they didn't put in enough cloth of gold. He's got 1000 dollar ruby-red slippers. It's good to be king! This is the kind of conspicuous overconsumption that leads to falls like the French kings, or the robber barons of the Gilded Age. The Pope wears Prada. He is a walking shrine to Mammon.
  • Then, there's the Nazi thing. The official line (the apologia?) for it was "it was a long time ago, and he was forced to, and all he did was shoot at tanks. And he was bad at it."
Yeah, there was coercion to join the Party, but there were plenty of people who didn't join, and plenty of people who resisted. Yes, it could be dangerous, it could disadvantage you. Taking those kinds of risks would require a very special sort of person – someone who could see through the dominant lies of your culture, someone who could recognize evil even when all around were calling it necessary. It would be a person of some conviction, inner strength, to do this. A one-in-a-million kind of guy.

It might take people like Sophie and Hans Scholl of the White Rose. These were students, who in 1943, in the middle of Germany at war, wrote letters of dissent. They wrote 7 of them. The last was never distributed. They posted some surreptitiously; they sent them out in the mails. They were seen throwing them out from the tenth story of a school building. They were arrested, tried, and executed. By beheading.

They were brought together by their convictions, and their faith. Their Roman Catholic faith. They felt the message of the Nazarene was incompatible with what Germany was doing. They acted. They were one in a million.

Ratzinger did NOT take these risks. And lest we think that he didn't know people who were anti-Nazi, you need go no further than his father to find someone who resisted. We're not even talking about the kinds of actions the Scholls took. We're talking about dodging the Hitler Youth. Which plenty of people did.

Ratzinger took the line of least resistance. He saw what happened to his father, and he bowed to strength. This is the man that they made Pope.

So now, we have the Prince of Rome, the man who is the successor of the Caesars. The Caesars themselves went through some tough times, as well. And some of the Caesars stood up against the lines of least resistance, and some did not. This Caesar, this Benedict XVI, showed us how he deals with strength. He bends. This Caesar has shown us how he deals with diversity: he holds tight to the status quo. This Caesar has shown us how he deals with controlling wealth: he adorns himself with gold. This Caesar has shown us how he deals with America: he uses his power to do all he can to ensure the victory of the Right.

Forget what kind of pope he is – what kind of Caesar is he?

The College of Cardinals got scared. The Church is under attack in the US for the sexual abuse, and the coverup of same. The congregants of the richest nations pulling them in liberal directions, their third-world members are pulling them conservative. The death of John Paul 2, a man who was one in a million, left a big hole that they plugged with the choice of least resistance.

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." Edmund Burke

Sunday, August 27, 2006

Winding up the weekend

A busy day, hanging out with friends of friends and the goddess Athena.

Worse ways to spend your time!

The 'big post' looks like a Monday morning production. Somehow it ended up over a thousand words. Need to get all the links added.

I don't know if people will read that! So; if anyone can tell me how to make Blogger do that 'here's the excerpt, read more...' thing, that would be great.

Saturday, August 26, 2006

Good morning, Blogostan!

3 Books you should think about:

People's History of the US - Zinn
Red Mars - Kim Stanley Robinson
Dreaming the Dark - Starhawk

Still working on the big post - friends staying with us for a week. Here's a hint: "Render Unto Caesar..."

Friday, August 25, 2006

Big post coming - try a little appetizer...

Today we will be serving self-referential crisps in a light meta- sauce.

20 days since I started posting regularly, and trying to let folks know I'm here. At some point, I updated the blog with a hit counter and a technorati account, so I can stare into my navel using 15 different metrics.

At this point, I'm waiting for the first hundred real hits. The hits I'm creating by opening the page and stuff are still measurable - 30% of the first 100.

I've written some good stuff, shoveled out some bits that really needed more work, and I am monitoring the amount of time I spend on it. Not like I've not got five thousand other things.

But this is fun! I can rant all I want, even use some of the swears, and some people like it!

I'd really love more comments. I see the poll as a great trick to see if someone's read it - sure, I can click on one of those.

If you've been here more than once, or read a couple of things, let me know what you like. Third person to leave a link in a comment gets a free plug on the page.

Thursday, August 24, 2006

Why Democrats are Dangerous: Unfulfilled Promises

Let's start with a Norman Solomon article, about how the "War on Terror" is still a powerful meme, despite some pronouncements that it's losing ground. Specifically, regarding Iran.

Looking ahead, does anyone credibly think that Democratic Party leaders can be relied on to stand up against rationales for a huge air assault on Iran -- in the face of predictable claims that a massive attack became necessary to forestall the development of nuclear weapons by a Tehran regime that supports the “terrorist” Hezbollah organization and has pledged the destruction of Israel?

In late summer 2006, all you’ve got to do is read the news pages of the New York Times to see systematic agenda-building for an airborne assault on Iran. Right now, in front of our eyes, the propaganda blitz is rivaling the kind of war groundwork laid by the same newspaper four years ago, replete with endless coverage of the U.S. government’s supposed “diplomatic” efforts.


The Democrats... someone once said that they're like a dysfunctional relationship. You get excited when they call out the Republicans on some kind of bullshit. Bill Clinton, who had economic policies to the right of Nixon, still thrills with his oratory, charms with his charisma. You remember moments when it looked like Kerry would win; when Dean stood up against the received (corporate) wisdom, when Edwards started talking not just about the middle class, or the "working class", but the poor.

And then they fail to filibuster Alito, they rush off like lemmings to vote for the PATRIOT ACT, when they start sucking up to Israel no matter what outrage the Israeli government has propagated. They pass bankruptcy "reforms" at the behest of big banks. They vote for Iraq, they don't push impeachment. They ignore black-box voting problems.

One or two may stand up and say the right thing; three or four might propose some legislation that won't get anywhere. But at the same time, seven or twelve or thirty of them are off sucking the dicks of the telecoms, to get rid of pesky problems like a democratic (small D) internet.

And there are many many people who affiliate with the Democratic Party for all the right reasons. Zogby asks me: do you feel that the Democratic Party or the Republican Party more closely represents your values? and I answer "Well, yes, the Democrats are closer."

But sometimes they're so far, far away.

Back to Iran. When the manufactured incident comes up, when they find dead bodies in Iranian regular army uniforms in Basra, when the mushroom cloud is trotted out yet again to fill the Depends of our aged voting base, what will Joe Biden say? What will Hillary say? Dick Lugar?

And so many who want to believe in the Democratic party will beg for spine, when the problem is soul. While the Democrats have such definite ties to our corportate masters, while they let themselves be led (or willingly throw themselves) upon the biased altar of the corporate media, we - the people - will step further down the path paved with good intentions. Paved with intentions, but mortared by actions.

Sorry, folks, FDR was a long time ago. I'll leave you with these words from Steve Perry, editor of the Twin Cities basedCity Pages.

And how does the rank and file react? Why don't the Democrats... If only the Democrats... If the Democrats were smart... Hold on right there. Let's dispense with the ridiculous, shopworn notion that the Democrats don't get it, that they are too dim or too timid to do the things that are evident to the rest of us: tack left, talk populist, stand up to Bush, push hot-button issues like corporate malfeasance, health care, and campaign finance reform.

They see these things as clearly as the rest of us, and they choose not to do any of them. Why? Money is the simple, vulgar answer, and the correct one. The matter of corporate crime, to take one example, is not seen by the Democrats as an opportunity to capitalize on Republican weakness and seize an upper hand; it is seen as a problem shared in common with Republicans--the problem of helping one's cash clients in a tough time.

Wednesday, August 23, 2006

Oooh! A 'Just Read It' post!

Just read it.

OK, I hate 'just read it' posts. It's Norwegianity. Here's a quote.

This fall the corporations will lose. Who will win? The corporations. A different set, but corporations just the same. Do you think it makes that much difference if your money is going to George Soros instead of the Walton sisters? Well, at this point in time, yeah, it makes some difference.

The Soros corporateers aren't blinded by ideology, and they'll work to make the world safe for business again. But don't kid yourself. Being you will still suck.

Fear Factor: Flying While Brown

Local union-busting airline monopoly Northwest got in on the big Terror Fury recently, with a plane from Amsterdam flying back after takeoff with F-16 escort. What have we learned?


Don't sit next to brown people on airliners
. They might be trying to make explosives, or maybe they're doing something worse - talking on cell phones (the shock!!) or moving from their assigned seats (the horror!!)

From the Greg Gordon article in the Star Tribune:

U.S. government officials, who requested anonymity, said crew members and air marshals observed the passengers in the rear of the wide-bodied DC-10 trying to use cell phones and passing them around during and shortly after takeoff from Schiphol Airport in Amsterdam. Cell phone use is barred on both U.S. and international flights. Some of the passengers also were trying to change seats, they said.

While cell phone use in general is a bane on society, it's a venal sin, not a cardinal one. And changing seats??? Has anyone flown lately? Airport seating algorithms are based on a combination of mystic runes and profit-maximization. On a half-empty flight (150 of 250 seats full) there's whole rows at the back empty, so some lucky and quick mover gets to lay down for the whole long flight.

Of course, these annoying and/or understandable behaviors become gross security risks if someone's brown. (Or Jerry Garcia, in this case...)

Nelson said he watched Dutch police come aboard in threes and escort a dozen men, 10 of them appearing to be of Pakistani or Middle Eastern descent, from the plane one by one in a remote parking area at the airport.

"Some they handcuffed before they took them out," he said. "One guy was a white guy, with a tie-dyed shirt, a beard and dreadlocks. He looked like a hippie. There was an older man who appeared to be of Indian descent."

My sweet love was asking me tonight what was up with all this. "Are they trying to make us afraid, or make us secure. I mean, we have to keep flying or the airlines will go bankrupt..." "More bankrupt" "Right, more bankrupt. So which is it? Fear or secure?"

The answer is 1) we feel fear, and 2) we are glad the vigilant pricks of the Bush administration are here to keep us alive. (Sorry - did I say vigilant pricks? I meant flaccid dicks. Bad me.)

Thankfully, the Big Lie is wearing thin. The Brit paper the Guardian calls it the "Alleged transatlantic airliners plot," while several people are pointing out either the bullshit or the US involvement - like where Scotland Yard tells the FBI to fucking shut their traps and blowing the investigation. Meanwhile, those arrested in the UK? "Police need more time..." to cover their asses, because they don't have much at all. (They got the extra time.)

The mental age that the Bush administration seems to be reaching for is that of a 6 year old boy. This is good propaganda technique; Adolf Hitler himself recommended it.
“All propaganda has to be popular and has to accommodate itself to the comprehension of the least intelligent of those whom it seeks to reach.”


But it can come crumbling down, and the Nazis knew this could happen as well. Joseph Goebbels, the propaganda minister, had this to say:

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”


The political consequences of being a swaggering pack of whiny bullies are coming due. The economic consequences of raping the poor and middle class to benefit the rich are coming due. The military consequences of keeping the economy on a war footing and tying down the forces in an attempt to seize control of mideast oil are coming due.

Look for greater attempts to repress dissent, since it's all coming apart.

[UPDATE]
Lawdy, lawdy! Who'd'a thunk it? Turns out these dangerous types weren't dangerous after all!!

Terrorism not involved in diverted NWA flight, report says: AP

AMSTERDAM, Netherlands --The interrogation of 12 men who were removed from a Northwest Airlines flight after they aroused the suspicions of air marshals and crew produced no evidence of terrorism, the Justice Ministry said Thursday.

Flight NW0042 to Bombay, India, returned to Amsterdam's Schiphol Airport on Wednesday escorted by Dutch fighter jets, and the 12 were questioned and arrested.

"From what is known until now, it does not appear that this is terrorism related," Justice Minister Piet Hein Donner told reporters in The Hague.


You wanna know what I think? I think Mr. Justice Minister needs to get with the program! C'mon!! FEAR!! FEEEEAAARRRR!!!!